Aulus Gellius on the Selection and
Lifestyle of Vestal Virgins
Name: Aulus Gellius Date: 125 – 180 CE Region: Rome [modern Italy] Citation: Athenian Nights 1.12 |
Those who
describe the “taking” of a Vestal Virgin [and Labeo Antistius describes this
the most elaborately] state that it is inappropriate to take one:
·
younger than six years old, or one
that is older than ten
·
if she has lost her mother or
father
·
if she has a speech impediment or is
hard of hearing, or has any other disability
·
if either she or her father is emancipated,
even if her father is alive, but her grandfather is her patriarch
·
or if either (or both) parents are
currently a slave, or are involved in shady business practices.
Furthermore, it
is also noted that she is exempt if
·
her sister has been chosen for a
priesthood
·
her father is a flamen augur, a Salian
priest, one of the fifteen overseers of the Sibylline books, or one of the
seven overseers of the holy banquets.
Other exemptions
include
·
if she is engaged to a priest
·
if she is a daughter of the sacred
Trumpeters.
Moreover, in his
writings, Capito Ateius stated that a daughter should not be selected from a
family that does not have residency in Italy, as well as a family that doesn’t
have three children.
Once a Vestal
Virgin is chosen, she is led to the Temple of Vesta and handed over to its
priests. As soon as that happens, she is immediately freed from her patriarch’s
control without an official emancipation declaration and without losing control
of her rights; she is also able to make her own will.
There are no ancient
sources on the selection of a Vestal Virgin, but [it is known] that the first
ones were selected by King Numa. I have, however, found the Papian Law that
twenty maidens are selected from the general population under the oversight of
the Chief Priest, and from that number, a lottery is held. The women selected
by the Chief Priest become Vestal Virgins. Nowadays, this lottery set up by the
Papian Law is no longer necessary. If someone of noble birth approaches the
Chief Priest and offers his daughter to the priesthood, provided that religious
A Vestal Virgin
is said to be “taken,” because she is taken by the hand of the Chief Priest
from the control of her parents, the way that a hostage is taken in wartime. In
Book 1 of his work on history, Fabius Pictor preserves the oath that a Chief
Priest is supposed to say when he “takes” a Vestal Virgin. This is
the oath: “Beloved one, I hereby seize you as one worthy to be a Vestal Virgin,
who shall perform rites on behalf of the Roman people.”
Many people think
that the word “taken” should only apply to Vestal Virgins; however, Flamen
Dialis, priests, and augurs are also said to be “taken.” In the second book of
his history, L. Sulla wrote: “P. Cornelius, the first to be named
Sulla, was taken as a Flamen Dialis.” When M. Cato accused Servius Galba,
he said the following about the Lusitanians: “They say that they wanted to
rebel. I really want to know the priestly ways, so does that mean I can be made
a priest? If I really wanted to know augury, does that mean I can be an
augur?” Moreover, in Labeo’s commentaries On the Twelve
She is called
“Beloved,” [Amata] when she is taken by the Chief Priest because that
was the name of the first Vestal Virgin taken.
Aulus Gellius on the
Selection and Lifestyle of Vestal Virgins
Virgo Vestae quid
aetatis et ex quali familia et quo ritu quibusque caerimoniis ac religionibus
ac quo nomine a pontifice maximo capiatur et quo statim iure esse incipiat,
simul atque capta est; quodque, ut Labeo dicit, nec intestato cuiquam nec eius
intestatae quisquam iure heres est.
Qui de virgine capienda scripserunt,
quorum diligentissime scripsit Labeo Antistius, minorem quam annos sex, maiorem
quam annos decem natam negaverunt capi fas esse; item quae non sit patrima et
matrima,
Praeterea Capito
Ateius scriptum reliquit neque eius legendam filiam, qui domicilium in Italia
non haberet, et excusandam eius, qui liberos tres haberet. Virgo autem
Vestalis, simul est capta atque in atrium Vestae deducta et pontificibus
tradita est, eo statim tempore sine emancipatione ac sine capitis minutione e
patris potestate exit et ius testamenti faciundi adipiscitur. De more
autem rituque capiundae virginis litterae quidem antiquiores non exstant, nisi,
quae capta prima et, a Numa rege esse captam. Sed Papiam legem invenimus, qua
cavetur, ut pontificis maximi arbitratu virgines e populo viginti legantur
sortitioque in contione ex eo numero fiat et, cuius virginis ducta erit, ut eam
pontifex maximus capiat eaque Vestae fiat. Sed ea sortitio ex lege Papia
non necessaria nunc videri solet.
Nam si quis
honesto loco natus adeat pontificem maximum atque offerat ad sacerdotium filiam
suam, cuius dumtaxat salvis religionum observationibus ratio haberi possit,
gratia Papiae legis per senatum fit.
“Capi” autem virgo propterea dici videtur, quia pontificis maximi manu prensa ab eo parente, in cuius potestate est, veluti bello capta abducitur. In libro primo Fabii Pictoris, quae verba pontificem maximum dicere oporteat, cum virginem capiat, scriptum est. Ea verba haec sunt: “Sacerdotem Vestalem, quae sacra faciat, quae ius sit sacerdotem Vestalem facere pro populo Romano Quiritibus, uti quae optima lege fuit, ita te, Amata, capio.” Plerique autem “capi” virginem solam debere dici putant. Sed flamines quoque Diales, item pontifices et augures “capi” dicebantur. L. Sulla rerum gestarum libro secundo ita scripsit: “P. Cornelius, cui primum cognomen Sullae impositum est, flamen Dialis captus.” M. Cato de Lusitanis, cum Servium Galbam accusavit: “Tamen dicunt deficere voluisse. Ego me nunc volo ius pontificium optime scire; iamne ea causa pontifex capiar? Si volo augurium optime tenere, ecquis me ob eam rem augurem capiat?”
Praeterea in commentariis Labeonis, quae ad duodecim tabulas composuit, ita scriptum est: “Virgo Vestalis neque heres est cuiquam intestato, neque intestatae quisquam, sed bona eius in publicum redigi aiunt. Id quo iure fiat, quaeritur.” “Amata” inter capiendum a pontifice maximo appellatur, quoniam, quae prima capta est, hoc fuisse nomen traditum est.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.